Blog

'Mad Dogs and Englishmen'

We are in a torrid era, where any person seemingly can accuse any individual of anything dastardly, without there being any evidence to support the allegations and then, too often, there is no redress if their allegations are found to be unsupported, non credible and without any evidence. The damage is then done to reputations where dignity and respect become lost. Honour is then devalued and trust is abandoned with relations severely compromised. This culture has now extended to cross border international relations.

This era is struggling to sink any lower.

I'm no lover of Mr.Putin and his chess playing tactics to foreign policy, especially his clear involvement in supporting Syria and his duplicity to the murder of many innocent Syrians. His agents have been clearly implicated in the murders of his former country men abroad. There are fairly big questions to be answered about his personal wealth accrued over the last 10 years. With it reported to be over $300 billion; on a Presidential salary? Whilst many of his countrymen live in poverty.

Hold on. Can we just accuse, without any significant evidence, and blame the Russians?  At this stage, until evidence comes forwards, this has the makings of  'naughty boy' (find an escapegoat) syndrome.  If we have evidence we should file procedures in the International Court of Justice to have him charged with crimes against humanity. On the surface he is probably as guilty as described, but can we allow the UK to be the accusers, prosecutors, jury and punishers on the statements such as Russia involvement is 'highly likely' and 'in all probably' the case. Little Englanders might determine this is not British, but is seems it has become a pivotal 'British'  way of Justice.

We are in an era of accusing anyone and everyone, with those accusing feeling safe that there will not be any repercussion, it is an extension to our modern culture of modern policing, that suppresses guilt over innocence. Until evidence comes forwards of Russian involvement in the poisoning of Sergei Skripal and his daughter, the Russians are probably whistling Noel Cowards 'Mad dogs and Englishmen'.

We have seen the decision overturned by judges yesterday, from the concerns of two females and their accusations. These females are yet determined to be victims,  they are currently only complainants. So far they have failed to get the listening ear or the Police or the CPS. Why? There maybe heaps of truth in their allegations and they might fall into the associated  'wrecked lives victims' group as a direct result of this blokes actions, but their cases have not been through a criminal court hearing to establish the truth.

So, yet again, a court has determined from allegations that this bloke has done all the things they claim, without a criminal court hearing and we bulldoze the doctrine of 'Innocent until proven guilty'. The press have all reported that there maybe over a hundred females who have been subject to his criminality. Surely somewhere along the line we should be sending in the 'Met' into, as it were, 'Feel his colar' and charge him with further offences. That would have kept him banged up on bail at least, if not continuing his in-terminate sentence, ensuring that the public are safe.

I recognise that the judges were deciding if Warboys was a fit and proper person to be released. I think I would be considered naive to think the judge (s) did not take into account the public outrage and a claimed 100 other cases (none of which have yet had the satisfaction of court prosecution of his harassing, assaulting and deceitful behaviour). My take is that the judge(s) have tried and prosecuted him, outside of a criminal court on the strength of accusation alone. 

This is 'kangaroo court' stuff that would be worthy of Russian Justice. 

(Appendix: I was profiled and judged wrongly, this is fact. Believe me when I say your immediate 'judgement' on people is very different to those of us who have been wrongly judged! I am quick to defend all those judged as guilty before a trial, as they should be considered 'innocent until the evidence of a trial is brought forward and leads to the defendant being proved guilty!).

<< Go back to the previous page

 

This is where we are at.

"Some professionals wear their heart on their sleeve, police officers wear their truncheon in their hand . . ."

A criminal defence solicitor talking about the culture of modern police forces.

Says it all, really!

 

This is a personal website. Opinions expressed are from my own experience. Data is supported by written evidence. This site has been a cathartic exercise to recondition my thoughts away from ending my life. Throughout, there is no intention to defame or cause any harm to another person. There is, however, an eagerness by me to share my story and life with others, letting the public know what is happening under their noses, allowing them to judge me with all the information.